Wednesday, March 05, 2008

Après lui, le déluge

The kitchen sink runneth over.

The fact that many would fall prey to such a desperate, Rovian grab-bag of distortion and misrepresentation brings home a truth that, now more than ever, must be recognized--a truth about us.

As long as we remain susceptible to negative campaigning--as long as we allow inchoate fear and primitive doubt to overwhelm our capacity to understand and check the facts--we will get the winners we deserve--namely, those who win ugly.

Democracy takes more than participation--a goal we have yet to achieve--it also takes a willingness to apply thought over fear.

We have been trained to respond to fear appeals aimed at the pursuit of electoral success very well over the past 7 years--and at this point, we should begin to become inured to them. In plain speaking: we should wise up.

The Clinton camp has discovered a formula that, at least in the days of its brief burst of novelty, has worked. We can expect a deluge of such tactics in the coming weeks.

However, despite a sink that will likely fill to bursting--paired, of course, with the conciliatory words that are meant to justify and allow further attacks--we now have time to adjust and evaluate.

We can and should do so.

A campaign that wins in adversity by the use of distortion and fear will govern in adversity in the same manner.

Note, as a single example, today's report by the CBC that Canadian Prime Minister Harper's chief of staff, Ian Brodie, was indeed the source the leak of supposed quotes regarding NAFTA--and that Clinton's team had also allegedly told Harper to "take her NAFTA concerns with a grain of salt."

This is the true "red phone" lesson, one that we should remember over the coming weeks. Overcome vague appeals to fear and unproven distortion. In the slowly receding shadow of these past two terms, pursue reality. In the face of appeals to induced doubt, unproven "experience", and dark insinuation, tenaciously learn--and vote--the facts.


-Dr. Alan J. Lipman

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

I would like to get permission from the author to post this on other blogs sites.
Well said.

Anonymous said...

From Minneapolis...
Saw this on WaPo this morning. Brilliant. Thanks for the thoughtful commentary. The best phrase for me -- "those who win ugly."

When Rove left the White House, I thought his nasty campaign style left politics, too. And as we've seen these past few weeks, that's certainly not the case. I gave Hillary the benefit of the doubt and thought she would stay clear of mud, fear-mongering and innuendo. Clearly that's not the case.

Anonymous said...

Very well put. Thinking individuals on both sides would probably appreciate this piece and I would like to post this, citing the author of course, as well.

Anonymous said...

Accusing a candidate is not slinging mud. If the charges have any basis in fact, which the recent ones by HRC do, then are are justified.

Karl Rove on the other hand and the "swiftboat" type ads were 100% fabricated. If it is hard for anyone to distinguish one from the other then need to take the time to look before they leap.

HRC is not the only one engaging in negative campaigns. All the other candidates do as well and they have always done so in every election I have followed and voted for since I have been old enough to care and I am 64 years old. It is the VOTERS responsibility to judge the candidates qualities for themselves without the the constant rant of one wing nut or another. The only people who make the noise are the same as the ones who would take your FREE vote away. They are so busy yelling that I some times seriously doubt they have the time to actually find facts for themselves.
Life long Democrat from AZ

Anonymous said...

This is a terrific commentary. I couldn't agree with it more. I'm sick to death of the deception and outright corruption that has been conducted over the past eight years. I now see the same thing happening with the Clinton campaign. They are desperate and they will do anything to win.

As a decline-to-state voter who's always voted Democrat, I'd rather vote for Nader or another third party candidate than vote for more of the same -- i.e., the staus quo.

Middlepath in San Francisco

Anonymous said...

. . . the staus quo meaning, Hillary and Bill Clinton.

middlepath

Anonymous said...

Nice analysis. Relentless spin seems to be HRC's strategy. Unfortunately, as long as the number of uneducated or less educated people remains high, negative campaigning will work.